First, let’s start with a little background. The original idea behind the design is a radio frequency (RF) resonant cavity thruster. This engine is also known as an EmDrive. The design is a concept for a thruster that is was introduced in 2001 by Roger Shawyer. He claimed that EmDrive can produce thrust by reflecting microwaves internally in the device. This is against that law of conservation of momentum which says if an object is stationary, it will remain stationary until a force is applied to it.
The design violates a few other laws of physics as we know as well. The drive has been tested both on earth and in the space. It has produced some result, but some say it works and others say that it doesn’t.
Ok, I am not here to explain the technical specification to you. There are enough articles and information online to cover that area. If you wish to know more about the technical information, please do some search on the Internet [link to an article].
What I want to tell you however is at 2014 whistleblowers informed about two types of engines which are used in SSP fleet. There are of course other types of engines but these two were mentioned. One of the engine types is EmDrive. According to whistleblowers  the vessel in space is already equipped with these types of engine. Another type of engine which has been mentioned is the torsion drive.
Torsion drives are used for space travel as well as time travel. There is also a type of a weapon which has been produced to use torsion to twist an enemy ship.
I know it sounds crazy, doesn’t it?
My question is: Does design really violate the laws of physic or the physic as we know, is incomplete?
Recently, I wrote an article about William Tompkins who claimed that everything we know and are written in schoolbooks is lies. (I would like to choose the word incomplete).
I mean scientist still believe that the Sun is a gaseous star. If you have read my article about “the-sun-is-not-gaseous-a-debunk-of-main-stream-theory-about-the-sun” you may start thinking otherwise. The article is written in simple language and YouTube clip is simple to understand as well. I recommend you watch it.
Anyway, my point is whenever someone comes with a revolutionary idea which can change the world, the mainstream scientists are always against it. If the idea is really revolutionary the governments around the world will silence it or in every possible way try to discredit the idea. So next time you hear mainstream news are discrediting an idea or someone, think about why they are doing so?