EmDrive doesn’t make sense!

EmDrive doesn’t make sense!

First, let’s start with a little background. The original idea behind the design is a radio frequency (RF) resonant cavity thruster. This engine is also known as an EmDrive. The design is a concept for a thruster that is was introduced in 2001 by Roger Shawyer. He claimed that EmDrive could produce thrust by reflecting microwaves internally in the device. This is against that law of conservation of momentum, which says if an object is stationary, it will remain stationary until a force is applied.

The design violates a few other laws of physics, as we know as well. The drive has been tested both on earth and in space. It has produced some results, but some say it works and others say that it doesn’t.

Ok, I am not here to explain the technical specification to you. There are enough articles and information online to cover that area. If you wish to know more about the technical information, please do some search on the Internet [link to an article].

What I want to tell you, however, is in 2014, whistleblowers informed about two types of engines that are used in the SSP fleet. There are, of course, other types of engines, but these two were mentioned. One of the engine types is EmDrive. According to whistleblowers [1][2][3][4], the vessel in space is already equipped with these types of engines. Another type of engine which has been mentioned is the torsion drive.

Torsion drives are used for space travel as well as time travel; There is also a type of a weapon which have been produced to use torsion to twist an enemy ship.

I know it sounds crazy.

My question is: Does design violate the laws of physic, or the physic as we know, is incomplete?
Recently, According to William Tompkins, everything we know and is written in schoolbooks is lies. (I would like to choose the word incomplete).

I mean, scientists still believe that the Sun is a gaseous star. If you have read my article about “The Sun is not Gaseous, A Debunk of mainstream theory about the Sun. ” you may start thinking otherwise. The article is written in simple language, and the YouTube clip is simple to understand as well. I recommend you watch it.

Anyway, my point is whenever someone comes with a revolutionary idea that can change the world, mainstream scientists are always against it. If the idea is revolutionary, the governments around the world will silence it or, in every possible way, try to discredit the idea.

So next time you hear mainstream news are discrediting an idea or someone, think about why they are doing so?

In the end, I would like to thank you for reading this article and, God bless you. If you wish to share this article, share it with someone you care about.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*